Why We Still Need Shakespeare’s Words

Before we argue—again—about whether Shakespeare is still relevant, it’s worth watching a three-minute clip that does more to answer the question than any curriculum guide ever could.

On The Late Show, Ian McKellen closes an interview with Stephen Colbert by performing a speech written over 400 years ago. The words come from Sir Thomas More, a play never staged in William Shakespeare’s lifetime but widely attributed—at least in part—to him.

McKellen doesn’t modernize the language.
He doesn’t explain it.
He just performs it.

And suddenly, the room changes.

The speech is addressed to a mob angry at “strangers”—immigrants. Instead of scolding them, the speaker does something far more dangerous: he asks them to imagine. Imagine families forced to leave. Imagine being driven out. Imagine becoming the stranger yourself.

That move—imagine this is happening to you—lands just as hard now as it did in the early 1600s.

This is the moment worth showing students.

Not because it’s Shakespeare trivia.
Not because it’s historically interesting.
But it reveals what Shakespeare actually does when he’s at his best.

He doesn’t tell audiences what to think.
He doesn’t offer slogans or easy answers.
He uses language to stretch empathy, flip perspectives, and force the listener into moral discomfort.

When McKellen delivers the lines, you can feel it: this isn’t “old English.” This is a warning. A mirror. A test of imagination.

This is also why Shakespeare still belongs in classrooms.

Students don’t need Shakespeare because he’s canonical.
They need him because he trains a skill we desperately need more of: the ability to see ourselves in someone else’s place.

When we teach Shakespeare as a decoding exercise—translate the words, answer the questions, move on—we miss the point. Shakespeare was writing for performance, for crowds, for moments like this one, where language interrupts complacency.

If students can watch this clip and feel its weight, then the question isn’t “Why are we still teaching Shakespeare?”

The question is “What happens when we stop teaching students how to imagine?”

And Shakespeare, inconveniently, still has some of the best words for that job.

The Stranger’s Case

Grant them [the immigrants] removed.

And grant that this your noise hath chid down all the majesty of England. Imagine that you see the wretched strangers, their babies at their backs with their poor luggage, plodding to the ports and coasts for transportation; and that you sit as kings in your desires, authority quite silenced by your brawl, and you in ruff of your opinions clothed. What have you got?

I’ll tell you: you have taught how insolence and strong hand should prevail, how order should be quelled. And by this pattern not one of you should live an aged man; for other ruffians, as their fancies wrought, with self‑same hand, self reason and self‑right, would shark on you, and men like ravenous fishes feed on one another.

You’ll put down strangers, kill them, cut their throats, possess their houses. Oh, desperate as you are, wash your foul minds with tears; and those same hands that you, like rebels, lift against the peace, lift up for peace, and your unreverent knees, make them your feet to kneel, to be forgiven.

And say now the king, as he is clement if the offender mourn, should so much come too short of your great trespass as but to banish you. Whither would you go?

What country, by the nature of your error, should give you harbor? Go you to France or Flanders, to any German province, Spain or Portugal—anywhere that not adheres to England—why, you must needs be strangers.

Would you be pleased to find a nation of such barbarous temper, that, breaking out in hideous violence, would not afford you an abode on earth; set their detested knives against your throats, spurn you like dogs, and, like as if that God owned not nor made not you, nor that the elements were all appropriate to your comforts, but chartered unto them?

What would you think, to be thus used?

This is the stranger’s case; and this your mountainish inhumanity…



The Eclectic Educator is a free resource for everyone passionate about education and creativity. If you enjoy the content and want to support the newsletter, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support helps keep the insights and inspiration coming!

Unmasking the Cultural Bias in AI: A Study on ChatGPT

monk surrounded by children
Photo by Suraphat Nuea-on on Pexels.com

In a world increasingly reliant on AI tools, a recent study by the University of Copenhagen reveals a significant cultural bias in the language model ChatGPT. The AI chatbot, which has permeated various sectors globally, from article writing to legal rulings, has been found to predominantly reflect American norms and values, even when queried about other cultures.

The researchers, Daniel Hershcovich and Laura Cabello, tested ChatGPT by asking it questions about cultural values in five different countries, in five different languages. The questions were derived from previous social and values surveys, allowing the researchers to compare the AI’s responses with those of actual people. The study found that ChatGPT’s responses were heavily aligned with American culture and values, often misrepresenting the prevailing values of other countries.

For instance, when asked about the importance of interesting work for an average Chinese individual, ChatGPT’s response in English indicated it as “very important” or “of utmost importance”, reflecting American individualistic values rather than the actual Chinese norms. However, when the same question was asked in Chinese, the response was more in line with Chinese values, suggesting that the language used to query the AI significantly influences the response.

This cultural bias in AI tools like ChatGPT has serious implications. As these tools are used globally, the expectation is for a uniform user experience. However, the current situation promotes American values, potentially distorting messages and decisions made based on the AI’s responses. This could lead to decisions that not only misalign with users’ values but may even oppose them.

The researchers attribute this bias to the fact that ChatGPT is primarily trained on data scraped from the internet, where English is the dominant language. They suggest improving the data used to train AI models, incorporating more balanced data without a strong cultural bias.

In the context of education, this study underscores the importance of students and educators identifying biases in generative AI tools. Recognizing these biases is crucial as it can significantly impact their work when using AI tools. For instance, if students use AI tools to research or generate content, cultural bias could skew their understanding or representation of certain topics. Similarly, educators must be aware of these biases to guide students appropriately and ensure a comprehensive and unbiased learning experience.

Moreover, the study serves as a reminder that AI tools are not infallible and should not be used uncritically. It encourages the development of local language models that can provide a more culturally diverse AI landscape. This could lead to more accurate and culturally sensitive responses, enhancing the effectiveness and reliability of AI tools in various fields, including education.

In conclusion, while AI tools like ChatGPT offer numerous benefits, it’s crucial to be aware of their limitations and biases. As we continue to integrate AI into our work and learning environments, we must strive for tools that respect and reflect the diversity of our global community.



The Eclectic Educator is a free resource for everyone passionate about education and creativity. If you enjoy the content and want to support the newsletter, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support helps keep the insights and inspiration coming!