DOGE Staffer Violates Treasury Policy—And Gets Rewarded?

dollar banknote on white table
Photo by Photo By: Kaboompics.com on Pexels.com

Another day, another blatant disregard for ethics and security from the Trump administration. This time, it’s Marko Elez, a former Musk employee turned government staffer, who violated Treasury policy by emailing personal data—unencrypted—to Trump officials.

Let’s recap:
⚠️ A 25-year-old with no business handling sensitive Treasury data was “mistakenly” given read-and-write access to federal payment systems.
⚠️ He resigned in February over racist social media posts.
⚠️ Instead of being held accountable, he was rehired—this time at the Social Security Administration, which also handles sensitive data.
⚠️ The Treasury claims this is ‘low risk’ because the leaked data didn’t contain Social Security numbers—because, apparently, as long as you don’t go full identity theft, it’s okay?

Meanwhile, 19 state attorneys general are suing the Treasury over DOGE’s access to payment systems, and courts have already ruled that the whole process has been “rushed and chaotic.” Yet the Trump administration is doubling down, brushing off serious security violations and giving Elez another government job.

This isn’t just incompetence. This is how authoritarianism operates—handing sensitive government roles to unqualified loyalists while gutting oversight. Elez might be a small player, but the bigger picture is clear: this administration values cronyism over competence, and security be damned.

💡 We need real accountability, fundamental safeguards, and real consequences for data breaches—before these people start handing out our Social Security numbers to billionaires and cronies.



The Eclectic Educator is a free resource for everyone passionate about education and creativity. If you enjoy the content and want to support the newsletter, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support helps keep the insights and inspiration coming!

Hochul’s Cellphone Ban: More Control, Less Freedom

warning sign on green wall
Photo by RDNE Stock project on Pexels.com

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul wants a statewide, bell-to-bell cellphone ban in schools, dictating how every district, student, and teacher handles devices. But the New York Senate is pushing back, demanding flexibility for schools and ensuring students won’t be suspended over cellphone violations.

The governor claims she’s doing what “parents and teachers want.” But let’s be honest: this isn’t about education but control. Schools already have policies. Local educators, not politicians, should decide what works best for their students.

Let’s break it down:
📵 Banning cellphones won’t fix student disengagement. The real problems—underfunded schools, high-stakes testing, economic stress, and a lack of mental health support—remain untouched.
📵 A one-size-fits-all ban ignores real student needs. Many students use phones for accessibility tools, translations, medical needs, family contact, and learning resources.
📵 Enforcement will fall on teachers and create unnecessary conflict. Instead of teaching, they’ll be the “phone police.”

Yes, social media addiction is a real issue. But banning tech won’t solve systemic failures in education. If Hochul cared about student well-being, she’d invest in smaller class sizes, more counselors, and policies that treat kids like humans, not distractions.

Good on the NY Senate for fighting back. Educators and communities should make school decisions—not politicians looking for a quick-fix headline.



The Eclectic Educator is a free resource for everyone passionate about education and creativity. If you enjoy the content and want to support the newsletter, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support helps keep the insights and inspiration coming!

Theocracy in Public Schools: Arizona GOP Pushes Religious Chaplains Over Trained Counselors

gray concrete road between grass field
Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

Arizona Republicans are at it again—dismantling public education and replacing it with religious indoctrination. Their latest stunt? SB 1269 allows untrained religious chaplains to provide mental health counseling to students instead of licensed professionals.

Rep. David Marshall says “Jesus is better than a psychologist,” as if prayer is an adequate substitute for professional mental health care. Meanwhile, Sen. Wendy Rogers, a known far-right extremist with ties to white nationalism, is leading the charge to erase the separation of church and state entirely—because, in her words, “that’s a myth.”

Let’s be clear: this bill isn’t about helping students. It’s about using public schools to funnel state-sanctioned religious propaganda to kids. Republicans claim there’s a “spiritual deficit” causing student mental health struggles—not economic inequality, not school shootings, not climate anxiety, not lack of access to healthcare, but a lack of religion.

This bill:
⚠️ Violates the First Amendment by forcing religious figures into public schools.
⚠️ Endangers students by replacing licensed counselors with untrained chaplains.
⚠️ Opens the door for Christian Nationalism while silencing minority faiths (or, let’s be honest, outright banning non-Christian chaplains).

Meanwhile, Democrats have been fighting for more school counselors, psychologists, and social workers—REAL solutions to the youth mental health crisis. But the GOP would rather ignore science, shove their religion down kids’ throats, and strip public education for parts.

Public schools should be secular, mental health support should be evidence-based, and the government should NOT be a pulpit.



The Eclectic Educator is a free resource for everyone passionate about education and creativity. If you enjoy the content and want to support the newsletter, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support helps keep the insights and inspiration coming!

Public Broadband Under Siege: Corporate Interests Threaten Rural America’s Digital Future

blue coated wire
Photo by Brett Sayles on Pexels.com

The $42.5 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program was designed to deliver high-speed fiber internet to underserved rural communities, ensuring equitable access to the digital world. However, recent developments indicate a troubling shift in priorities.​

Evan Feinman, the outgoing director of the BEAD program, has raised alarms about the current administration’s intentions to divert substantial funds to Elon Musk’s Starlink, a satellite-based internet service. Feinman warns that this move could leave rural America with subpar internet service, enriching billionaires at the expense of quality infrastructure.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has announced a “rigorous review” of the BEAD program, criticizing it for not yet connecting any individuals and attributing this to “woke mandates” and regulatory burdens. This rhetoric paves the way for policy shifts favoring satellite providers like Starlink, potentially sidelining the superior fiber-optic solutions that BEAD was set to prioritize.

Feinman’s departure and cautionary message highlight a broader issue: the infiltration of corporate interests into public policy. The potential redirection of funds from fiber projects to satellite services compromises the quality of internet service for rural communities. It funnels public money into the coffers of the ultra-wealthy.​

We must oppose this corporate takeover of our public infrastructure. High-speed fiber internet is a public good and a necessity in today’s digital age. Allowing billionaires to dictate the quality and accessibility of our internet services undermines the principles of equity and public welfare.



The Eclectic Educator is a free resource for everyone passionate about education and creativity. If you enjoy the content and want to support the newsletter, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support helps keep the insights and inspiration coming!

The McMahon/Holiday Reading List: 20 History Books Worth Your Time

Sharon McMahon — “America’s Government Teacher,” former high school government teacher turned educator with a massive non-partisan following — stopped by Ryan Holiday’s Painted Porch bookstore in Bastrop, Texas, for a book conversation that got immediately added to my watch list.

I follow both of them. McMahon, because she does what great history education should do: she makes the stakes of the past feel present without manufacturing false urgency. Holiday because he reads seriously and recommends honestly, and because his bookstore is the kind of independent shop that invests in curation rather than bestseller display tables. When these two sit down to geek out about overlooked American history, the reading list they produce is worth paying attention to.

The conversation covered a lot of ground — from Booker T. Washington’s pragmatism to Taylor Branch’s monumental civil rights trilogy to the kind of narrative nonfiction that turns history into something you can’t put down. What I appreciate about both of them is the underlying argument running through the whole exchange: that knowing history isn’t a luxury or an academic exercise. It’s how you understand how the present got built and what actually holds it together.

Below is the full list they produced, with notes on the ones I’d prioritize or already recommend to others.


The Full List

Up from Slavery — Booker T. Washington
The book Holiday kept returning to throughout the conversation. Washington’s autobiography is one of the most influential American texts ever written, and it’s been criminally underread. His pragmatism, his insistence on building from where you are rather than waiting for ideal conditions — these ideas rippled through American history in ways McMahon traces brilliantly (Julius Rosenwald, Toni Morrison’s relationship to his legacy, John Lewis). Read this before almost anything else on this list.

A Slave in the White House — Elizabeth Dowling Taylor
The story of Paul Jennings, James Madison’s enslaved manservant, who witnessed some of the most consequential events in early American history and whose own story has been largely invisible to that history. The kind of primary source experience that reframes everything you thought you knew about the period.

The Mind on Fire — Mark Noll
An intellectual biography of 19th-century American Christianity and its relationship to questions of history, science, and social change. For educators considering the relationship among values, knowledge, and action, this is rich territory.

Her Right Foot — Dave Eggers
A children’s book about the Statue of Liberty — specifically about why she’s mid-stride, walking forward, and what that movement means about America’s promise and its unfulfilled obligations. Short enough to read in one sitting. Hits harder than its length suggests.

The Devil in the White City — Erik Larson
If you’ve never read Larson, start here. The 1893 World’s Fair in Chicago, the architect building a city from scratch, and a serial killer operating in its shadow. Larson is the gold standard for narrative nonfiction that reads like a novel without sacrificing accuracy. I’ve recommended this book to more people than any other on this list.

The Demon of Unrest — Erik Larson
Larson again, covering the months between Lincoln’s election and the first shots at Fort Sumter. What’s striking about this period is how many people on all sides believed the catastrophe could still be avoided right up until it wasn’t. A deeply uncomfortable read in the current climate.

Dead Wake — Erik Larson
The Lusitania. The convergence of the ship’s last voyage and the U-boat tracking it, told with the same intercutting technique that makes all of Larson’s books compulsive. Once you read one Larson,
you will read them all.

A Woman of No Importance — Sonia Purnell
Virginia Hall ran resistance operations in occupied France during World War II with a prosthetic leg, a price on her head, and constant sabotage from the OSS bureaucrats who didn’t believe a woman could do what she was doing. The title is what the Gestapo put in her file. This is one of the best narrative histories I’ve read in years.

The River of Doubt — Candice Millard
Theodore Roosevelt, after losing the 1912 election, led an expedition into an unmapped tributary of the Amazon that nearly killed him. Millard writes the whole thing with propulsive momentum and no sentimentality. Remarkable story, excellently told.

In a Sunburned Country — Bill Bryson
Bryson’s account of Australia — its history, its absurdity, its extraordinary natural world, and the peculiar fact that everything there seems designed to kill you. His best travel book, which is saying something. A palate cleanser between heavier reads.

Tunnel 29 — Helena Merriman
Thirty-five people tunneled under the Berlin Wall to freedom in 1962. Merriman spent years tracking down the survivors and reconstructed the story from their accounts. Holiday’s 2024 best-of list called it so good he sometimes had to put it down and walk around to calm down. That tracks.

Say Nothing — Patrick Radden Keefe
The Troubles in Northern Ireland through the story of the Price sisters, Jean McConville’s disappearance, and what happens to people who commit violence in the service of a cause and then have to live with what they did. Keefe is the best longform journalist working, and this is his masterwork. Required reading.

Leadership: In Turbulent Times — Doris Kearns Goodwin
Goodwin on Lincoln, FDR, LBJ, and TR — four presidents whose capacity to lead was forged through adversity and failure rather than smooth ascent. Less hagiographic than most political biographies. Useful as a study of how leadership actually develops.

Parting the Waters — Taylor Branch
Volume one of Branch’s trilogy on the civil rights movement. 900 pages. Worth every one. The most comprehensive and human account of that period in American history, and the one that connects the movement’s internal debates, personal relationships, and strategic decisions in ways no shorter account can. McMahon talked about this throughout the conversation as essential reading. She’s right.

The Year of Living Constitutionally — A.J. Jacobs
Jacobs spent a year trying to live according to the Constitution as literally as possible — including the 18th-century context, the historical debates, and the original meanings of phrases we’ve since abstracted into symbols. Funny and genuinely illuminating. Good entry point for anyone who teaches government or civics.

Why Fish Don’t Exist — Lulu Miller
Ostensibly a biography of taxonomist David Starr Jordan, this book is actually about what happens when the systems we build to make sense of the world collapse — and what it might mean to keep going anyway. One of the most unusual nonfiction books I’ve read. Harder to describe than to read.

Everything Happens for a Reason — Kate Bowler
Bowler, a historian of prosperity gospel, was diagnosed with Stage IV cancer at 35 while pregnant. This book is her account of what it’s actually like to live inside a culture that can’t tolerate the absence of meaning — and what honest faith looks like when the easy answers are stripped away. Devastating and necessary.

A Gift from the Sea — Anne Morrow Lindbergh
Written in 1955, this slim meditation on solitude, simplicity, and the pressures of modern life has sold millions of copies over seven decades because it remains true. A different pace than the rest of this list. Worth it.

Good Inside — Dr. Becky Kennedy
The parenting book that connects most directly to Self-Determination Theory — Kennedy’s framework is built around the idea that behavior is communication and that children need autonomy, connection, and competence rather than compliance. Useful for parents and anyone who works with children.

Bury the Chains — Adam Hochschild
The British abolition movement is told as the improbable story of a small group of people who decided to dismantle an institution that was economically foundational to the empire in which they lived. Hochschild is meticulous and morally serious. One of the best books on how social change actually happens.


Where I’d Start

If you’re new to this kind of narrative history and want to know where to begin, Say Nothing (Keefe), A Woman of No Importance (Purnell), and Up from Slavery (Washington) will pull you in immediately and leave you wanting more. The Devil in the White City (Larson) is the gateway drug for this entire genre. Parting the Waters (Branch) is the most important book on the list and the most demanding — save it for when you have time to commit.


The original conversation between McMahon and Holiday is worth watching in full: “Sharon McMahon’s Reading List” (from Ryan Holiday). It’s the kind of book talk that makes you want to buy five things immediately.

Affiliate disclosure: Some links above are Amazon affiliate links. If you buy through them, I earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.



The Eclectic Educator is a free resource for everyone passionate about education and creativity. If you enjoy the content and want to support the newsletter, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support helps keep the insights and inspiration coming!

Could Medical-Style Residencies Save Our Struggling Schools?

Teacher preparation programs could take a page from medical training, emphasizing hands-on practice, focused research, and sustained mentorship. Residency-style programs offer promising solutions as the education landscape grapples with high turnover among new teachers and declining student achievement. These models provide novice teachers extensive classroom experience under expert guidance, ensuring they are better equipped from day one. While traditional student teaching often lacks depth and practical relevance, these residencies focus on “gradual release” approaches, allowing new educators to build confidence and skills gradually rather than diving straight into full responsibility.

But adopting a medical residency model isn’t without its hurdles. Funding challenges, inconsistent state requirements, and uneven compensation remain significant barriers. As education leaders look toward the future, it’s clear that reshaping teacher preparation is desirable and necessary for improving classroom outcomes nationwide.

Mental Health, Teacher Pay, and School Choice: What’s Missing in Governors’ Education Plans?

Across the country, governors have laid out ambitious education plans for 2025—but have they missed the mark on boosting student achievement? While state leaders from both parties broadly agree on increasing education funding, supporting student well-being, and enhancing career pathways, few have directly addressed declining academic performance. FutureEd’s analysis reveals significant bipartisan commitments, including strengthening teacher pay and addressing youth mental health, yet highlights stark ideological divides over school choice and the role of diversity initiatives in education.

With federal pandemic-relief funds drying up, previously celebrated interventions like tutoring and enrichment programs are fading into the background. As governors debate whether school choice initiatives or stricter academic standards will drive student improvement, educators wonder: Are we missing an opportunity to place learning at the heart of education policy?

Education Under Attack? Why the ‘Unitary Executive’ Fight Matters for Schools

Unitary executive theory might sound like dry political jargon, but it’s at the heart of debates reshaping how the American government—and potentially education policy—functions. Despite some sensational headlines, the theory doesn’t aim to eliminate the three-branch structure of government; rather, it emphasizes the president’s control over the executive branch, specifically around the ability to remove officials. But why should educators and policymakers care?

Education policy, like other areas managed by specialized agencies, often depends on a certain degree of political independence to ensure expertise rather than short-term politics drive decisions. Agencies like the Institute for Education Sciences (IES) and the National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB) are designed precisely with this independence, with leadership terms deliberately spanning multiple presidential administrations.

However, under the Trump administration, these agencies face new challenges as unitary executive theory pushes the boundaries of presidential power. Recent moves by the administration, including contract cancellations and the politically motivated dismissal of key appointees, suggest a test of how far executive authority can stretch.

Why does this matter for education? If the independence of agencies like IES and NAGB is compromised, education policy could increasingly become a political football, undermining long-term, evidence-based educational improvement. For educators and policymakers alike, understanding this debate isn’t just about constitutional theory—it’s about safeguarding the stability and integrity of our educational institutions.